Add sct and cert verification #1
Conversation
loosebazooka
force-pushed
the
add-sct-verification
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b78b894 to
8bc998d
Compare
|
@di here is working sct/cert validation. There are sample in src/test/resources. They are generated off of my email, so it does feel weird to include them in a python client, but you could get away using them to test your code for now. |
loosebazooka
force-pushed
the
add-sct-verification
branch
from
8ffeba2 to
98fe347
Compare
src/main/java/dev/sigstore/fulcio/client/SigningCertificate.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
loosebazooka
force-pushed
the
add-sct-verification
branch
from
98fe347 to
d3f3635
Compare
loosebazooka
force-pushed
the
add-sct-verification
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5b21366 to
1d72526
Compare
loosebazooka
force-pushed
the
add-sct-verification
branch
5 times, most recently
from
de94559 to
f37a67b
Compare
loosebazooka
force-pushed
the
add-sct-verification
branch
from
f37a67b to
2f1f53e
Compare
| public CertificateResponse(CertPath certPath, @Nullable byte[] sct) { | ||
| this.certPath = certPath; | ||
| this.sct = sct; | ||
| public class FulcioValidationException extends Exception { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it's kind of weird to fork a response into an exception
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this extend RuntimeException?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, we want the tool to catch this and present it to the user. I don't think it's a catastrophic failure. It could be a misconfigured private key, or the wrong fulcio or something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK. Makes sense. We should chat about our approach here some time with Jason. I'll typically avoid throwing any checked exceptions unless it's type or api enables the client in some way.
|
|
||
| public static FulcioValidator newFulcioValidator( | ||
| byte[] fulcioRoot, @Nullable byte[] ctfePublicKey) | ||
| throws InvalidKeySpecException, NoSuchAlgorithmException, CertificateException, IOException, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just curious why we allow the ctfePublicKjey to be null if that'll just result in a validation exception when we call validateSct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it can be null because scts aren't required to be returned from fulcio. they should be, but people could be running private instances and maybe don't care about internal certificate transparency (but maybe they should?)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can this be enforced via a policy/config?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
But validate will always fail as a result won't it?
src/main/java/dev/sigstore/fulcio/client/SigningCertificate.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
loosebazooka
force-pushed
the
add-sct-verification
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e7b5663 to
16db253
Compare
loosebazooka
force-pushed
the
add-sct-verification
branch
from
16db253 to
5e71715
Compare
- Rename CertificateResponse to SigningCertificate - SCTs are optional - Add more testing around parsing - Add example fulcio/ctfe public keys and sct/cert examples for testing - Exceptions are still kinda just passed along Signed-off-by: Appu Goundan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]>
loosebazooka
force-pushed
the
add-sct-verification
branch
from
5e71715 to
adc9c2a
Compare
Add sct and cert validations